revolt in style, but just for a while
Oct. 1st, 2009 07:34 pm[Error: unknown template video]
no. not exactly. it doesn't seem fair that all the flag wearing, gun toting, yelling, astro turf butt wipes were actually RIGHT! of course for totally the wrong reasons...
but still single payer doesn't have a chance, because there's too much money in insurance. and even PALIN WAS RIGHT?!?! in a way, maybe they're not 'death panels for grannies' but more denial of coverage, as a way for the insurance companies to keep their profit margin huge
I'm all for socialized medicine, as it is NOW it's illegal for a doctor to not treat a patient in need. so who pays for the uninsured? YOU DO! and ME! as well.
its just a shame that rich buttlicks have the time to go around acting like protestors, while the unemployed masses don't have the time to travel and hire noisemakers to yell at legislators...
wow, I got political there for a sec.
no. not exactly. it doesn't seem fair that all the flag wearing, gun toting, yelling, astro turf butt wipes were actually RIGHT! of course for totally the wrong reasons...
but still single payer doesn't have a chance, because there's too much money in insurance. and even PALIN WAS RIGHT?!?! in a way, maybe they're not 'death panels for grannies' but more denial of coverage, as a way for the insurance companies to keep their profit margin huge
I'm all for socialized medicine, as it is NOW it's illegal for a doctor to not treat a patient in need. so who pays for the uninsured? YOU DO! and ME! as well.
its just a shame that rich buttlicks have the time to go around acting like protestors, while the unemployed masses don't have the time to travel and hire noisemakers to yell at legislators...
wow, I got political there for a sec.